The Compound Effect of Cupping Therapy: Searching Beyond the Meridians

Article information

J Acupunct Res. 2018;35(3):101-103
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 August 27
doi : https://doi.org/10.13045/jar.2018.00136
1National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2College of Medicine, Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
*Corresponding author. National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia E-mail: m.khalil@nccam.gov.sa; statkhl@hotmail.com
Received 2018 May 23; Revised 2018 June 21; Accepted 2018 June 26.

Abstract

Cupping therapy (CT) is used in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East and is prevalent in Muslim communities where it is recommended by the Prophet of Islam. The majority of modern, medical practitioners interested in CT, view it as a medical technique and distance themselves from the mechanisms proposed by traditional medicine. However, modern medicine does not offer a valid explanation for the mechanisms involved in CT. There is growing evidence of CT’s effectiveness, specifically in chronic pain management when compared to an inactive control, but not against sham treatment. CT accompanied by religion and prayer, as it is in Muslim communities, cannot be considered to be equivalent to any procedures in modern medicine. “Whole System Research” may be the most appropriate trial design to test the ancient practice of CT efficacy whilst pending development of a novel placebo for assessing the connectivity of body and mind interventions.

Introduction

Cupping therapy (CT) is usually referred to as an ancient Chinese practice, but the history of cupping can be traced back to diverse and ancient civilizations in both the Eastern and Western world [1-3]. The continuity and widespread use of CT reflects a model of interconnectivity and cross-cultural influence. Although CT is named differently across cultures and traditions worldwide the basic procedure is the same and the referred cupping sites can be linked to corresponding Chinese acupuncture points [4]. The increased acceptance and openness to use traditional and complementary medicine in the industrialized world [5-8] has been accompanied by research [9, 10] identifying the clinical effects and biological mechanisms of traditional medicine [11]. Acupuncture is at the center of research interests, especially in the industrialized world [12-14]. However, CT is more prevalent than acupuncture in certain areas such as the Middle East, and in Muslim communities because of the religious aspects of the treatment [15-18]. In an attempt to evaluate effectiveness of CT and to identify the underlying biological mechanism, CT research needs to address the misunderstandings brought about by the complexity of connectivity between the mind and the body [19]. A challenge similar to that faced by acupuncture research [19] and it is made more difficult by the lack of understanding of the compound effect of CT in different communities, which can further complicate the “mind–body concept.”

Religious and spiritual influences as part of the compound effect of CT

The relationship between spirituality, religion, and medicine as a healing system has been recognized since antiquity [20,21]. However, in highly developed countries religion and medicine have been separated and are seen as 2 systems of healing. This is not the case in many developing countries [21,22] where organized religion can influence medical interventions. For example, Eastern religion-inspired traditional practices can promote or oppose specific practices imported from other traditions [23].

CT known as “hijamah” in Muslim communities is very popular and is categorized under “Prophetic Medicine” [24]. Prophetic Medicine is related to the collection of “hadiths” or accounts of the sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad that are related to sickness, diet, hygiene, and other aspects or determinants of health. Hijamah was specifically mentioned and endorsed by the Prophet Muhammad. Among other narratives of “hadith or prophetic sayings,” the Prophet noted that “Hijamah is the best of your remedies.” [24-26].

In Prophetic Medicine and according to the majority of Muslims, there is no need to search for a scientific explanation or evidence of effectiveness or mechanism of action of treatments because they are considered credible as a consequence of having been recommended by the Prophet of Islam [27]. This explains the unique status of hijamah in Muslim societies [16]. It also explains the priority given to regulating CT in Saudi Arabia.

The majority of practitioners providing CT in Muslim communities used to perform CT accompanied by recitations from the Quran or narrations of the sayings of the Prophet. Mixing religious rituals with CT indicates the complexity of evaluating the compound effect of hijamah if accompanied by prayer as a part of religious belief. It has been proposed that Islamic religious rituals comprise elements of mind–body medicine [28].

Mechanism of action of CT in the light of traditional and modern medicine

CT has been a successful treatment for centuries. However, its mechanism of action is not yet well understood. As CT forms part of traditional medicine, concepts embedded in traditional medicine such as the meridian system have been used to propose a mechanism of action [29,30]. Within the same concept, the effects of local negative pressure applied to the human body or skin puncturing have also been studied. The research has included specific changes in local tissue structure, stretching of the nerves and muscles, increased blood circulation, and auto hemolysis. Still, these were considered as multiple types of stimulation exerted onto the regional acupoint areas [31].

When modern medical practitioners became interested in CT, they divorced CT from its origins and re-conceived it as a technique. The majority of modern medical practitioners attempted to keep their distance from the mechanisms offered by traditional medicine to explain the effects of CT and focused on theories from the perspective of modern medicine [32,33]. The pain gate theory [34,35], diffuse noxious inhibitory control [36-38] the reflex zone theory, the activation of the immune system [10,39,40], and blood detoxification were among the proposed explanations [41]. However, no single theory has been able to explain CT’s mechanism of action. Moreover, no one has been able to explain why the effect of CT was small and comparable to that of sham treatment, and if those mechanisms were in fact capable of explaining the effect of CT [42,43].

Measuring the compound effect of CT

A growing body of evidence has been reported in systematic reviews and clinical trials describing the effectiveness of CT for musculoskeletal pain [24], low back pain [44], migraine [45], herpes zoster [46], hypertension, and other conditions [46,47]. However, evidence of CT effectiveness, specifically in chronic pain management compared to an inactive control [44,46,47], but not against sham treatment [42], has shown CT to have various nonspecific effects. Sham devices in CT and acupuncture research may also have some of the same contextual effects and are actually an active placebo [48].

Modern research on the specific effects of cupping using advanced techniques [49], or measuring specific hematological and biochemical parameters [10,40] is an excellent achievement. Nevertheless, it may explain only part of the compound effect of CT.

No one can argue that a sham control is the correct methodological approach in evaluating the evidence of the specific effects of any intervention. However, measuring the effectiveness in complementary and traditional medicine interventions has proven to be more pragmatic as it measures both the specific and nonspecific effects of the intervention [50].

Attempts to eliminate the nonspecific effects of the intervention in efficacy trials as compared with a placebo will underestimate the holistic effects of complementary medicine interventions, as was proven in acupuncture trials [51]. It may result in the retraction of a positive recommendation to use complementary medicine intervention [52,53]. A misunderstanding of the complex relationship between mind and body has been the most crucial factor giving rise to misleading trial outcomes [19]. Ignoring the whole human being and the importance of the healing potential of the mind or simply the “mind–body concept” [54-56] will also lead to the underestimation of the effect of CT, just as with any other complementary approach. Comparative effectiveness trials contrasting CT with standard care may therefore be the appropriate study design [48,50].

Conclusion

The widespread use of CT in nonpharmacological pain management needs further and rigorous research given its usefulness as part of an integrative approach to lower the cost of pain management in healthcare [57]. Its status as an ancient practice indicates its reliance on the complex connections between the mind and the body. New research should take into consideration the holistic research approach and the compound effect of the entire specific and the contextual effects included in CT. The complexity of these inseparable effects and their potential synergistic effect requires innovative evaluative research concepts.

Whole System Research using mixed methods to address the healing theory and the complexity of intervention in CT is the ideal approach.

Notes

Authors declared no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Bamfarahnak H, Azizi A, Noorafshan A, Mohagheghzadeh A. A tale of Persian cupping therapy: 1001 potential applications and avenues for research. Forsch Komplementmed 2014;21:42–47.
2. Qureshi NA, Ali GI, Abushanab TS, El-Olemy AT, Alqaed MS, El-Subai IS, et al. History of cupping (Hijama): a narrative review of literature. J Integr Med 2017;15:172–181.
3. Yang J. The history of cupping therapy. Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi 1999;29:82–84. [in Chinese].
4. Huang YL. Cupping-bloodletting therapy of Saudi Arabia and its clinical application. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu 2008;28:375–377. [in Chinese].
5. Pang R, Wang S, Tian L, Lee MC, Do A, Cutshall SM, et al. Complementary and Integrative Medicine at Mayo Clinic. Am J Chin Med 2015;43:1503–1513.
6. Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002-2012. Natl Health Stat Report 2015;10:1–16.
7. Jonas WB, Eisenberg D, Hufford D, Crawford C. The evolution of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the USA over the last 20 years. Forsch Komplementmed 2013;20:65–72.
8. Davis MA, Martin BI, Coulter ID, Weeks WB. US spending on complementary and alternative medicine during 2002-08 plateaued, suggesting role in reformed health system. Health Aff 2013;32:45–52.
9. Wang CZ, He H, Wang X, Yuan CS. Trends in scientific publications of Chinese medicine. Am J Chin Med 2012;40:1099–1108.
10. Ahmed SM, Madbouly NH, Maklad SS, Abu-Shady EA. Immunomodulatory effects of blood letting cupping therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Egypt J Immunol 2005;12:39–51.
11. Tong YY, He W, Yang C, Zhang B, Du J, Zhao YK. Analysis of the status and trends of international research in complementary and alternative medicine based on literature mining. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao 2012;10:597–603. [in Chinese].
12. Gamus D. Advances in research of complementary and integrative medicine: a review of recent publications in some of the leading medical journals. Harefuah 2015;154:9–15. [in Hebrew].
13. Ma Y, Dong M, Zhou K, Mita C, Liu J, Wayne PM. Publication Trends in Acupuncture Research: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis Based on PubMed. PLoS One 2016;11e0168123.
14. Yu J. The Rise of Chinese Acupuncture in the West: How an Ancient Eastern Tradition Became an American Medical Staple. Vet Herit 2015;38:1–9.
15. Alrowais NA, Alyousefi NA. The prevalence extent of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) use among Saudis. Saudi Pharm J 2017;25:306–318.
16. Nimrouzi M, Mahbodi A, Jaladat AM, Sadeghfard A, Zarshenas MM. Hijamat in traditional Persian medicine: risks and benefits. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 2014;19:128–136.
17. Abdullah Al-Rowais N, Al Bedah AM, Khalil MK, El Olemy AT, Khalil AA, Alrasheid MH, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of primary health care physicians towards complementary and alternative medicine in the Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia. Forsch Komplementmed 2012;19:7–12.
18. AlBedah AM, Khalil MK, Elolemy AT, Al Mudaiheem AA, Al Eidi S, Al-Yahia OA, et al. The use of and out-of-pocket spending on complementary and alternative medicine in Qassim province, Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2013;33:282–289.
19. Briggs JP, Shurtleff D. Acupuncture and the Complex Connections Between the Mind and the Body. JAMA 2017;Jun. 27. 317:2489–2490.
20. Romeo N, Gallo O, Tagarelli G. From Disease to Holiness: Religious-based health remedies of Italian folk medicine (XIX-XX century). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2015;11:50.
21. Koenig HG. Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications. ISRN Psychiatry 2012;2012:278730.
22. Ramakrishnan P, Dias A, Rane A, Shukla A, Lakshmi S, Ansari BK, et al. Perspectives of Indian traditional and allopathic professionals on religion/spirituality and its role in medicine: basis for developing an integrative medicine program. J Relig Health 2014;53:1161–1175.
23. Khalil MKM. Importing Well-Researched Practices from Other Traditions: Thoughts from a Conservative Society. J Altern Complement Med 2017;23:829–830.
24. AlBedah A, Khalil M, Elolemy A, Elsubai I, Khalil A. Hijama (cupping): a review of the evidence. Focus Altern Complement Ther 2011;16:12–16.
25. Sheikh BY, Sarker MMR, Kamarudin MNA, Ismail A. Prophetic medicine as potential functional food elements in the intervention of cancer: A review. Biomed Pharmacother 2017;95:614–648.
26. Ijaz H, Tulain UR, Qureshi J, Danish Z, Musayab S, Akhtar MF, et al. Review: Nigella sativa (Prophetic Medicine): A Review. Pak J Pharm Sci 2017;30:229–234.
27. Monette M. The medicine of the prophet. CMAJ 2012;184:E649–E650.
28. Saniotis A. Understanding Mind/Body Medicine from Muslim Religious Practices of Salat and Dhikr. J Relig Health 2018;57:849–857.
29. Ghods R, Sayfouri N, Ayati MH. Anatomical Features of the Interscapular Area Where Wet Cupping Therapy Is Done and Its Possible Relation to Acupuncture Meridians. J Acupunct Meridian Stud 2016;9:290–296.
30. Yan Q. Moving cupping at three yang meridians of hand for cervical spondylosis. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu 2014;34:66. [in Chinese].
31. Cui S, Cui J. Progress of researches on the mechanism of cupping therapy. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu 2012;37:506–510. [in Chinese].
32. Al-Bedah AMN, Elsubai IS, Qureshi NA, Aboushanab TS, Ali GIM, El-Olemy AT, et al. The medical perspective of cupping therapy: Effects and mechanisms of action. J Tradit Complement Med [Preprint] 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2018.03.003.
33. Lowe DT. Cupping therapy: An analysis of the effects of suction on skin and the possible influence on human health. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2017;29:162–168.
34. Mendell LM. Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain. Pain 2014;155:210–216.
35. Moayedi M, Davis KD. Theories of pain: from specificity to gate control. J Neurophysiol 2013;109:5–12.
36. Bannister K, Patel R, Goncalves L, Townson L, Dickenson AH. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls and nerve injury: restoring an imbalance between descending monoamine inhibitions and facilitations. Pain 2015;15:1803–1811.
37. Fleckenstein J. Acupuncture in the context of diffuse noxious inhibitory control. Eur J Pain 2013;17:141–142.
38. Yarnitsky D. Conditioned pain modulation (the diffuse noxious inhibitory control-like effect): its relevance for acute and chronic pain states. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010;23:611–615.
39. Zhang CQ, Liang TJ, Zhang W. Effects of drug cupping therapy on immune function in chronic asthmatic bronchitis patients during protracted period. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi 2006;26:984–987. [in Chinese].
40. Baghdadi H, Abdel-Aziz N, Ahmed NS, Mahmoud HS, Barghash A, Nasrat A, et al. Ameliorating Role Exerted by Al-Hijamah in Autoimmune Diseases: Effect on Serum Autoantibodies and Inflammatory Mediators. Int J Health Sci 2015;9:207–232.
41. Tagil SM, Celik HT, Ciftci S, Kazanci FH, Arslan M, Erdamar N, et al. Wetcupping removes oxidants and decreases oxidative stress. Complement Ther Med 2014;22:1032–1036.
42. Lauche R, Spitzer J, Schwahn B, Ostermann T, Bernardy K, Cramer H, et al. Efficacy of cupping therapy in patients with the fibromyalgia syndrome-a randomised placebo controlled trial. Sci Rep 2016;6:37316.
43. Lee MS, Kim JI, Kong JC, Lee DH, Shin BC. Developing and validating a sham cupping device. Acupunct Med 2010;28:200–204.
44. AlBedah A, Khalil M, Elolemy A, Hussein AA, AlQaed M, Al Mudaiheem A, et al. The Use of Wet Cupping for Persistent Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Altern Complement Med 2015;21:504–508.
45. Ahmadi A, Schwebel DC, Rezaei M. The efficacy of wet-cupping in the treatment of tension and migraine headache. Am J Chin Med 2008;36:37–44.
46. Cao H, Li X, Liu J. An updated review of the efficacy of cupping therapy. PLoS One 2012;7:28.
47. Al Bedah AM, Khalil MK, Posadzki P, Sohaibani I, Aboushanab TS, AlQaed M, et al. Evaluation of Wet Cupping Therapy: Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Altern Complement Med 2016;22:768–777.
48. Fregni F, Imamura M, Chien HF, Lew HL, Boggio P, Kaptchuk TJ, et al. Challenges and recommendations for placebo controls in randomized trials in physical and rehabilitation medicine: a report of the international placebo symposium working group. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010;89:160–172.
49. Emerich M, Braeunig M, Clement HW, Ludtke R, Huber R. Mode of action of cupping--local metabolism and pain thresholds in neck pain patients and healthy subjects. Complement Ther Med 2014;22:148–158.
50. Weeks J. The March for Effectiveness Science. J Altern Complement Med 2017;23:397–398.
51. Yang B, Yi G, Hong W, Bo C, Wang Z, Liu Y, et al. Efficacy of acupuncture on fibromyalgia syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Tradit Chin Med 2014;34:381–391.
52. Birch S, Lee MS, Robinson N, Alraek T. The U.K. NICE 2014 Guidelines for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Lessons Learned in a Narrative Review Addressing Inadvertent Limitations and Bias. J Altern Complement Med 2017;23:242–246.
53. Latimer NR, Bhanu AC, Whitehurst DG. Inconsistencies in NICE guidance for acupuncture: reanalysis and discussion. Acupunct Med 2012;30:182–186.
54. Dobos G, Tao I. The model of Western integrative medicine: the role of Chinese medicine. Chin J Integr Med 2011;17:11–20.
55. Kotecki J, Khubchandani J, Simmons R, Sharma M. Mind-body interventions: applications and potential opportunities for health education practice. Health Promot Pract 2015;16:157–161.
56. Rentala S, Fong TC, Nattala P, Chan CL, Konduru R. Effectiveness of body-mind-spirit intervention on well-being, functional impairment and quality of life among depressive patients - a randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs 2015;71:2153–2163.
57. A. DJ, H. GK, D. FM, L. RR, David W. Cost Savings from Reducing Pain Through the Delivery of Integrative Medicine Program to Hospitalized Patients. J Altern Complement Med 2018;24:557–563.

Article information Continued