The Effects of Korean Medical Treatment Combined with Embedding Acupuncture on Patients with Chronic Lower Back Pain: a Retrospective Study

Article information

Acupunct. 2016;33(2):165-171
Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, Mokpo Oriental Hospital of Dongshin University
*Corresponding author: Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, Mokpo Oriental Hospital of Dongshin University, 313, Baengnyeon-daero, Mokpo-si, Jeollanam-do, 530-822, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-61-280-7903, E-mail: fire-sjc@hanmail.net
Received 2016 May 30; Revised 2016 June 07; Accepted 2016 June 09.

Abstract

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical effects of Korean medical treatments combined with Embedding acupuncture on patients with chronic lower back pain.

Methods:

We reviewed the medical records of 40 patients with chronic lowerback pain hospitalized at Dongshin Korean Medicine Hospital from March, 2015 to February, 2016. They were divided into two groups: the embedding acupuncture group (20 patients) and the non-embedding acupuncture group(20 patients).

To evaluate the efficacy of the treatments, the 40 patients were asked to complete a Numerical Rating scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) four times during admission.

Results:

The mean NRS of the embedding acupuncture group decreased more significantly than the non-embedding acupuncture group at days three and ten of admission. The ODI change and ODI rate of change of the embedding acupuncture group were significantly greater than the non-embedding acupuncture at days three and ten of admission.

Conclusion:

Korean medical treatment combined with embedding acupuncture might be effective in reducing pain and improving the life quality of patients with chronic lower back pain.

We hope that further studies will be done to produce more clinical data and ensure effective application of these results.

Fig. 1

Flow chart of the research protocol

Distribution of Sex and age

Distribution of during admission

Distribution of ODI

NRS comparison between NEA and EA

ODI of change comparison between NEA and EA

ODI rate of change comparison between NEA and EA

Notes

This research was supported by the Dongshin University research grants

References

1. Lee YC. A study of occupational low back pain(LBP) in general hospital nurses [dissertation] Cheonju: Cheon buk university; 2004. Korean.
2. Ministry of health & welfare. Surveys about the use of Korean medicine and the herbal medicine consumption Sejong: Human Culture Arirang. 2013p. 5.
3. Liu L, Skinner M, McDonough S, Mabire L, Baxter GD. Acupuncture for Low Back Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;328196:1–18.
4. Jeong IH, Yoon YH. Inno Technic Seoul: Hansol medical publishing; 2014. p. 188–9.
5. Kwon K. The Analysis on the Present Condition of Thread-embedding Therapy Papers Published in Journal of Korean Medicine. J Korean Med Ophthalmol Otolarygol Dermatol 2014;27(4):16–44.
6. Lee HG, LIM JG, Jeong DJ, Yook TH, Kim JW. Case Report on 4 Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation Treated with Concurrent Embedding Therapy under Conventional Korean Medical Treatments. Korean J Oriental Physiology & Pathology 2013;27(1):124–9.
7. Jang HG, Woo CH, Ahn HD, Kwon HJ. A Clinical Four Case Studies on Chronic Low Back Pain Treated by Needle Embeeding Therapy. The J of Korea CHUNA Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerve 2014;9(2):45–55.
8. Yoo DJ, Jung JY, Chung SH. Effects of the Embedding Acupuncture Treatments for Chronic Low Back Pain Patients. J of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation 2015;25(4):105–12.
9. Dekker-van Weering MG, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ. A pilot study-he potential value of an activity based feedback system for treatment of individuals with chronic lower back pain. Disability and rehabilitation 2015;37(24):2250–6.
10. Lee IS, Jo HJ, Lee SH, et al. Systematic Review of Selection of Acupuncture Points for Lower Back Pain. The Acupuncture 2012;29(4):519–36.
11. Kim DH, Shin WS, Lee JW, et al. A Review of Questionnaire for the Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain. J of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation 2013;23(4):95–115.
12. Kim GM, Park SY, Lee CH. A Rasch Analysis of the Korean Version of Oswestry Disability Questionnaire According to General Characteristics of Patients With Low Back Pain. Phys Ther Korea 2011;18(2):35–42.
13. The Korean Orthopaedic Association. Orthopaedics Seoul: Newest Medicine company; 2013. p. 860–3.
14. Kim EG, Park WH, Cha YY. Analysis of the Efficacy of Acupuncture for Chronic Low back pain Based on the Relationship Between Trunk Flexors and Extensors. Korean J Oriental Physiology & Pathology 2012;26(4):557–65.
15. Shin WS, Park WH, Cha YY. The Research Trends on the Acupuncture Treatment of Lumbar Herniated Intervertebral Disc Using PubMed Database. J of Korean Medicine Rehabiliation 2014;24(4):49–60.
16. Noh SH, Kim YR, Kim KH, Yang GY, Kim JK, Lee BR. Effects of Catgut-embedding Acupuncture Therapy on Plantar Fasciitis: Case Report. The Acupuncture 2013;30(5):227–33.
17. Korean Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine Society Textbook Compilation Committee. Acupuncture Medicine Seoul: Hanmibook; 2016. p. 181–4.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Flow chart of the research protocol

Table 1

Distribution of Sex and age

20~29 30~39 40~49 50~59 60~70
NEA M 0 1 1 0 2 4 20
F 1 1 1 11 2 16

EA M 0 3 0 1 0 4 20
F 0 3 1 8 4 16

Table 2

Distribution of during admission

NEA EA
15 ~ 19(day) 6 8
20 ~ 25(day) 14 12

sum 20 20

Table 3

Distribution of ODI

NEA EA
moderate(21 ~ 40) 2 3
severe(41 ~ 60) 14 13

crippled(61 ~ 70) 4 4

Table 4

NRS comparison between NEA and EA

3day follow up 10day follow up discharge
NEA(n=20) 8.85 ± 1.27 5.95 ± 1.96 2.9 ± 2.49
EA(n=20) 7.55 ± 1.47 4.55 ± 1.82 2.35 ± 2.23

p-value .005 .025* .466

NEA: No Embedding Acupuncture group.

EA: Embedding Acupuncture group.

All values showed mean ± SD.

p-values were calculated by independent t-test.

*

p<0.05.

p<0.01.

p<0.001.

Table 5

ODI of change comparison between NEA and EA

3day follow up 10day follow up discharge
NEA(n = 20) 5.3 ± 4.95 18.8 ± 9.87 32.7 ± 14.97
EA(n = 20) 11.5 ± 5.58 26.1 ± 11.54 35.4 ± 12.55

p-value .001 .038* .540

NEA: No Embedding Acupuncture group.

EA: Embedding Acupuncture group.

All values showed mean ± SD.

p-values were calculated by independent t-test.

*

p<0.05.

p<0.01.

p<0.001.

Table 6

ODI rate of change comparison between NEA and EA

3day follow up 10day follow up discharge
NEA(n = 20) 10.29 ± 9.85 39.04 ± 20.5 63.59 ± 27.12
EA(n = 20) 23.38 ± 11.64 53.15 ± 18.63 70.99 ± 18.91

p-value .000 .028* .323

NEA: No Embedding Acupuncture group.

EA: Embedding Acupuncture group.

All values showed mean ± SD.

p-values were calculated by independent t-test.

*

p<0.05.

p<0.01.

p<0.001.