Effects of Korean Medical Combination Treatment for 102 Cases of Cervical Disc Herniation: An Observational Study

Article information

Acupunct. 2016;33(2):11-20
1Department of Acupuncture & Moxibusion Medicine, Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
2Department of Oriental Internal Medicine, Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
3Department of Oriental Rehabilitation Medicine, Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
4Department of Acupuncture & Moxibusion Medicine, Haeundae Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
*Corresponding author: Department of Acupuncture & Moxibusion Medicine, Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, 644, Tanbang-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 302-859, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-10-3064-1078, E-mail: jh0931@naver.com
Received 2016 April 14; Revised 2016 May 06; Accepted 2016 May 17.

Abstract

Objectives:

The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of Korean medical combination treatment for cervical disc herniation.

Methods:

This is an observational study. 102 patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniation by MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) were investigated from January, 2015 through to December, 2015 at Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine. They were sorted according to the distribution of sex, age, causing factor, the period of disease, admission day and pain area. All patients were treated with acupuncture, Chuna treatment, and herbal therapy and physical therapy during the admission period. After treatment, NRS (Numeric Rating Scale), NDI (Neck Disability Index) and EQ-5D were assessed to evaluate the treatment efficacy.

Results:

There were more females than Males with a ratio of 1: 1.37, the age of fifty was the most with 35.29 %, reason unknown was the most with 72.55 % and the subacute stage was the most with 38.24 %. According to disc herniation types, patients with protruded disc types were the most with 66.67 % and a lesion of C5/6 was the most with 41.18 %. For patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniation, neck and shoulder pain NRS decreased from 6.43 ± 1.77 to 3.96 ± 1.96(p<0.001) and radiating pain NRS decreased from 5.64 ± 1.96 to 3.57 ± 1.88 (p<0.001). NDI decreased from 41.72 ± 14.04 to 30.84 ± 15.34(p<0.001), and the EQ-5D index increased from 0.68 ± 0.17 to 0.79 ± 0.14(p<0.001) after treating cervical disc patients.

Conclusion:

Korean medical combination treatment might be effective in decreasing pain and raising the life quality of patients with cervical disc herniation.

Distribution of Sex and Age

Distribution of causes

Distribution of Period of Illness

Distribution of Admission Days

Distriibution of Numbers Grade and Position of Herniation

Distribution of Pain Area

Neck and shoulder pain NRS Difference before and after Treatment

Radiating pain NRS Difference before and after Treatment

NDI Difference before and after Treatment

EQ-5D Index Difference before and after Treatment

References

1. Suk SI. Third Edition Textbook of Spinal Surgery Seoul: Newest Medical Publishing Company; 2011. p. 248–60.
2. The Korean Orthopaedic Association. Orthopedics 6th edth ed. Seoul: ChoiSin medical Publishing Co; 2006. p. 584–6.
3. William HM, Jorg J, Thomas W. Examination and diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders II Seoul: Hanmi Medical Publishing Company; 2002. 520p. 532.
4. Kim YH, Moon DE, Park CM, Yoon JW. The Sponaneous Resorption of Herniated Lumbar Disc. Korean J Pain 2005;18(1):56–9.
5. Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society Textbook Compliation Committee. The Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine Third vol Paju: Jipmoondang; 2008. p. 59.
6. Lee OJ, Kim HH. Clinical Study on Soft Cervical Disc Herniation. The Acupuncture 2004;21(4):85–92.
7. Lee HE, Cho JH, Moon JY, et al. The Clinical Study on 88 patients of Cervical Disc Herniation. The Acupuncture 2008;25(6):145–52.
8. Kim SY, Park HS, Kim MC, et al. Effects of Korean Medical Combination Treatment for Herniated Intervertebral Lumbar Disc Patients: An Observational Study. The Acupuncture 2014;31(4):21–8.
9. Kim SM, Lee SH, Shin YB, et al. Effects of Korean Medical Combination Treatment on 72 Cases of Herniated Intervertebral Lumbar Disc Patients: An Observational Study. The Acupuncture 2015;32(2):23–33.
10. Shin YS, Shin JS, Lee J, et al. A Survey among Korea Medicine Doctors (KMDs) in Korea on Patterns of Integrative Korean Medicine Practice for Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Displacement: Preliminary Research for Clinical Practice Guidelines. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015;15:432–9.
11. Gang HS, Hong SH, Gang CH. Musculoskeletal radiology 1st edth ed. Seoul: Bummun Education; 2013. p. 811–5.
12. Patrick D, Ronald M. Textbook of Pain Seoul: Jungdam; 2002. p. 483–4.
13. Jang HJ, Koh DI, Han SH, et al. Rehabilitation of the Spine Seoul: Pureunsol; 2000. 84p. 87.
14. Lee YK, Nam HS, Chuang LH, et al. South Korean Time Trade-Off Values for EQ-5D Health States: Modeling with Observed Values for 101 Health States. Value Health 2009;12(8):1187–93.
15. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society. Third Edition The Text book of Spine Seoul: Koonja; 2013. p. 733–4. p. 739.
16. Gang HS, Lee JW. Spinal Imaging Seoul: Bummun Education; 2013. p. 45.
17. Han TR, Bang MS. Third Rehabilitation Medicine Seoul: Koonja; 2011. p. 789–90.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Distribution of Sex and Age

N %
Sex Male 43 42.16
Female 59 57.84

Age 20 ~ 29 3 2.94
30 ~ 39 21 20.59
40 ~ 49 34 33.33
50 ~ 59 36 35.29
60 ~ 8 7.84

Total 102 100

Table 2

Distribution of causes

N %
Reason unknown 74 72.55
Overwork 15 14.71
Trauma 4 3.92
Slip down 9 8.82

Total 102 100

Table 3

Distribution of Period of Illness

N %
Hyperacute stage 13 12.75
Acute stage 27 26.47
subacute stage 39 38.24
Chronic stage 23 22.55

Total 102 100

Table 4

Distribution of Admission Days

N %
1 ~ 10 26 25.49
11 ~ 20 31 30.39
21 ~ 30 19 18.63
31 ~ 40 20 19.61
41 ~ 50 2 1.96
50 ~ 4 3.92

Total 102 100

Table 5

Distriibution of Numbers Grade and Position of Herniation

N %
Numbers 1 8 7.84
2 21 20.59
3 30 29.41
4 28 27.45
5 11 10.78
6 4 3.92

Grade Bulging 15 14.71
Protrusion 68 66.67
Extrusion 19 18.63

Position C2 / 3 0 0
C3 / 4 10 9.80
C4 / 5 26 25.49
C5 / 6 42 41.18
C6 / 7 23 22.55
C7 / T1 1 0.98

Total 102 100

Table 6

Distribution of Pain Area

N %
Just Neck and Shoulder pain 12 11.76
Neck and shoulder pain with Radiating pain 90 88.23

Total 102 100

Table 7

Neck and shoulder pain NRS Difference before and after Treatment

N NRS
p-value
Before After
Sex Male 43 6.06 ± 1.70 3.44 ± 1.93 p<0.001*
Female 59 6.69 ± 1.78 4.33 ± 1.92

Age <40 24 6.29 ± 2.09 4.00 ± 2.08
≥40 78 6.47 ± 1.67 3.94 ± 1.94

Period of disease Most Acute stage 13 7.07 ± 1.11 4.46 ± 1.94
Acute stage 27 6.44 ± 1.92 3.81 ± 2.00
Subacute stage 39 6.17 ± 1.76 4.00 ± 1.87
Chronic stage 23 6.47 ± 1.90 3.78 ± 2.17

Total 102 6.43 ± 1.77 3.96 ± 1.96

Average NRS values are means ± standard deviation.

p-value by paired t–test in before and after NRS.

*

p<0 001.

Table 8

Radiating pain NRS Difference before and after Treatment

N NRS
p-value
Before After
Sex Male 38 5.36 ± 1.66 3.26 ± 1.63 p<0.001
Female 52 5.84 ± 2.14 3.80 ± 2.02

Age <40 20 5.00 ± 2.33 3.10 ± 2.10 0.002
≥40 70 5.82 ± 1.81 3.71 ± 1.81 p<0.001

Period of disease Most Acute stage 11 5.90 ± 2.11 3.72 ± 1.48 0.010*

Acute stage 24 5.37 ± 2.16 3.37 ± 2.20 p<0.001

Subacute stage 34 5.73 ± 1.54 3.82 ± 1.66

Chronic stage 21 5.66 ± 2.33 3.33 ± 2.08

Total 90 5.64 ± 1.96 3.57 ± 1.88

Average NRS values are means ± standard deviation.

p-value by paired t-test in before and after NRS.

*

p<0.05.

p<0.01.

p<0.001.

Table 9

NDI Difference before and after Treatment

N ND
p-value
Before After
Sex Male 43 36.32 ± 11.44 25.67 ± 13.27 p<0.001
Female 59 45.66 ± 14.53 34.61 ± 15.74

Age <40 24 37.83 ± 12.60 28.10 ± 12.94
≥40 78 42.92 ± 14.32 31.68 ± 15.98

Period of disease Most Acute stage 13 44.76 ± 15.43 29.89 ± 12.77 0.002*

Acute stage 27 39.86 ± 15.06 27.30 ± 16.38 p<0.001

Subacute stage 39 41.75 ± 14.98 33.22 ± 17.68

Chronic stage 23 42.13 ± 10.49 31.49 ± 10.38

Total 102 41.72 ± 14.04 30.84 ± 15.34

Average NRS values are means ± standard deviation.

p-value by paired t-test in before and after NDI.

*

p<0.01.

p<0.001.

Table 10

EQ-5D Index Difference before and after Treatment

N EQ-5D Index
p-value
Before After
Sex Male 43 0.73 ± 0.12 0.83 ± 0.11 p<0.001
Female 59 0.65 ± 1.96 0.76 ± 1.55

Age <40 24 0.73 ± 0.13 0.82 ± 0.12
≥40 78 0.67 ± 0.18 0.78 ± 0.14

Period of disease Most Acute stage 13 0.60 ± 028 0.77 ± 0.23 0.028*

Acute stage 27 0.68 ± 0.13 0.82 ± 0.09 p<0.001

Subacute stage 39 0.69 ± 0.15 0.79 ± 0.11

Chronic stage 23 0.73 ± 0.16 0.77 ± 0.16 0.015*

Total 102 0.68 ± 0.17 0.79 ± 0.14 p<0.001

Average NRS values are means ± standard deviation.

p-value by paired t-test in before and after NDI.

*

p<0.01.

p<0.001.