A Study of Surface Electromyography Measurement of Wrist Exercise (Extension, Flexion, Grasping) in Healthy People

Article information

Acupunct. 2015;32(3):53-60
1Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, Korean Medicine Hospital of Woosuk University
2Department of Korean Oriental Pediatrics, College of Korean Medicine, Woosuk University
3Department of Meridian & Acupoint, College of Korean Medicine, Woosuk University
*Corresponding author: Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, Korean Medicine Hospital of Woosuk University, 46, Eoeun-ro, Wansan-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, 54987, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-63-220-8625, E-mail: ju1110@hanmail.net
Received 2015 August 03; Revised 2015 August 13; Accepted 2015 August 21.

Abstract

Purpose:

This study aimed to prove that surface electromyography(SEMG) can be used to identify the degree of symptoms of diseases in the upper extremities; it also aimed to confirm various potential therapeutic effects through an inquiry into the value measured by the SEMG on certain acupuncture points in the upper extremities.

Methods:

Fifty healthy people received instructions for the method of exercise: wrist flexion, extension and hand grasping. Disposable electrodes were attached to acupuncture points of Susamni(LI10), Naegwan(PC6), Oegwan(TE5) and below Sohae(HT3) two cun on both sides in flexion, extension and grasping to measure the SEMG values. The research results were analyzed using SPSS statistics Ver. 22.0(IBM, USA).

Results:

The average value was highest on Naegwan(PC6) in grasping, and the average SEMG value was higher in the order of grasping, extension and flexion. The asymmetry index of each point was Susamni(LI10) 16.26±13.59 %, Oegwan(TE5) 20.38±15.59 %, below Sohae(HT3) two cun 20.89±16.77 %, Naegwan(PC6) 22.49±14.91 % in wrist extension, Susamni(LI10) 25.99±21.44 %, Oegwan(TE5) 21.15±15.94 %, below Sohae(HT3) two cun 19.62±15.46 %, Naegwan(PC6) 19.93±16.85 % in wrist flexion, Susamni(LI10) 16.60±12.21 %, Oegwan(TE5) 10.94±8.29 %, below Sohae(HT3) two cun 15.20±12.60 %, Naegwan(PC6) 11.68±7.77 % in grasping.

Conclusions:

In this study, to identify the degree of symptoms of diseases in the upper extremities and confirm therapeutic effects, it is necessary to analyze the calculated percentage and compare the SEMG measurement of special points with those of other points, and with the asymmetry index.

Fig. 1

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value

Fig. 2

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at left wrist extension

Fig. 3

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at right wrist extension

Fig. 4

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at left wrist flexion

Fig. 5

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at right wrist flexion

Fig. 6

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at left hand grasping

Fig. 7

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at right hand grasping

Average of SEMG’s Root Mean Square Value

Comparison SEMG’s Root Mean Square Average Between Left and Right (Mean ± SD)

Average of Asymmetry Index (Mean ± SD)

References

1. Hwang MS, Yoon JH. Study of the meridian muscle theory. The Acupuncture 2005;22(1):29–39.
2. Jo JH, Lee JS, Kim SS. A study of the meridian muscle electrography for the clinical application. J Oriental Rehab Med 2005;15(4):89–104.
3. Kang SY. Introduction to electromyography. Korean J Pain 1994;7(1):13–24.
4. Kim JU, Lee HG, Jung DJ, et al. A study on the correlation between surface electromyography and assessment scale for facial palsy. The Acupuncture 2013;30(5):140.
5. Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine Society. Acupuncture and moxibustion medicine Gyeonggi: Jipmoondang; 2012. 286p. 360. p. 473. p. 486.
6. Lee HG, Jung DJ, Choi YM, et al. A study of surface electromyography measurement of facial muscles in normal person. The Acupuncture 2014;31(2):52. :61.
7. Kim CY, Choi JD, Kim SY, et al. Reliability and validity of ultrasound imaging and sEMG measurement to external abdominal oblique and lumbar multifidus muscles. PTK 2011;18(1):37–46.
8. Yu JG, Kim DS. Electromyography Seoul: Korea; 2009. p. 1–2.
9. Kim JR, Park JS, Jo YJ. Biomechanical measuring techniques for evaluation of workload. J Ergon Soc Korea 2010;29(4):451–2.
10. Jo YJ, Kim JR. The effect of the signal stationarity on the EMG frequency analysis. J Ergon Soc Korea 2010;29(2):186–7.
11. Kim JR, Jung MC. The comparison of sensitivity of numerical parameters for quantification of electromyographic(EMG) signal. Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers 1999;25(3):330.
12. Back SH. Effect of sports massage treatment during recovery period after an acute exercise on muscle function, cardiovascular function, lactate and electrolyte [dissertation] Jeonju: Jeonbuk Univ.; 2009. Korean.
13. Kim TW, Gong SJ, Gil SG, et al. Electromyographic analysis: theory and application Seoul: Hanmi Med; 2013. 43
14. Peter V, Frank A, Bernhard C, Hamilton C. The muscle Seoul: Hansol Med; 2009. p. 89–100.
15. Frank H. Atlas of human anatomy 4th edth ed. Seoul: Jungdam; 2007. 440p. 448.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value

Fig. 2

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at left wrist extension

Fig. 3

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at right wrist extension

Fig. 4

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at left wrist flexion

Fig. 5

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at right wrist flexion

Fig. 6

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at left hand grasping

Fig. 7

Average of SEMG’s root mean square value(mean) at right hand grasping

Table 1

Average of SEMG’s Root Mean Square Value

Mean±SD
E-LI10 232.73±116.69
E-TE5 119.37±75.53
E-HT3 below 2 Chon 54.45±47.59
E-PC6 45.96±27.72

F-LI10 64.79±64.08
F-TE5 75.79±56.85
F-HT3 below 2 Chon 172.46±126.41
F-PC6 91.03±69.43

G-LI10 257.07±115.06
G-TE5 171.83±63.43
G-HT3 below 2 Chon 233.77±120.84
G-PC6 294.36±112.94

SD: standard deviation. E: extension. F: flexion. G: grasping.

Table 2

Comparison SEMG’s Root Mean Square Average Between Left and Right (Mean ± SD)

Mean±SD
Lt E-LI10 229.04±107.13
E-TE5 131.04±86.41
E-HT3 below 2 Chon 54.74±37.33
E-PC6 49.30±31.09

F-LI10 70.48±74.25
F-TE5 81.50±63.40
F-HT3 below 2 Chon 183.68±140.21
F-PC6 82.70±53.22

G-LI10 247.72±123.25
G-TE5 170.24±68.11
G-HT3 below 2 Chon 227.66±122.18
G-PC6 284.84±113.89

Rt E-LI10 236.42±126.51
E-TE5 107.70±61.49
E-HT3 below 2 Chon 54.16±56.41
E-PC6 42.62±23.72

F-LI10 59.10±52.12
F-TE5 70.08±49.44
F-HT3 below 2 Chon 161.24±111.21
F-PC6 99.36±82.26

G-LI10 266.42±106.68
G-TE5 173.42±59.03
G-HT3 below 2 Chon 239.88±120.42
G-PC6 303.88±112.31

Table 3

Average of Asymmetry Index (Mean ± SD)

Mean±SD(%)
E-LI10 16.26±13.59
E-TE5 20.38±15.59
E-HT3 below 2 Chon 20.89±16.77
E-PC6 22.49±14.91

F-LI10 25.99±21.44
F-TE5 21.15±15.94
F-HT3 below 2 Chon 19.62±15.46
F-PC6 19.93±16.85

G-LI10 16.60±12.21
G-TE5 10.94±8.29
G-HT3 below 2 Chon 15.20±12.60
G-PC6 11.68±7.77