Acupunct Search


J Acupunct Res > Volume 32(1); 2015 > Article
Choi, Oh, Cho, Kim, Kim, Lee, and Kim: Research on the Amount of Stimulus Differences According to Pharmacopuncture Injected dose and Characters Method※
See the Original "".



This study was designed to discover the difference in stimulation effect when the volume and insertion method of mountain ginseng pharmacopuncture was varied.


48 healthy people were randomly injected with 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 cc of mountain ginseng pharmacopuncture, perpendicularly or transversely at acupoints LI9 and LI10. The subjects noted their level of stimulation on a 100 mm visual analog scale(VAS) immediately after, 3 minutes after, and 5 minutes after the treatment.


There was no significant statistical difference in the stimulation strength between perpendicular injection and transverse injection pharmacopuncture. There was significant statistical difference in the stimulation strength when the volume of pharmacopuncture was varied. As the volume of pharmacopuncture increased from 0.1 cc to 0.3 cc, and to 0.5 cc, the stimulation strength increased as well.


We found that volume of pharmacopuncture may be a controlling element for mountain ginseng pharmacopuncture. Additional study is needed for pharmacopuncture’s stimulation adjusting factors.


This study was supported by a grant of the Traditional Korean Medicine R&D Project, Ministry for Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea(B110069)

Fig. 1.
Differences of stimulation strength by stimulation insertion method
VAS: visual analogue scale.
Fig. 2.
Differences of stimulation strength by insertion method according to the volume of pharmacopuncture
Fig. 3.
Differences of stimulation strength by volume of pharmacopuncture
*: statistically significant by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni (p〈0.05).
Fig. 4.
Differences of stimulation strength by volume of pharmacopuncture according to insertion method
Table 1.
Demographic Data of Participants
Variable Mean ± SD or n(%) Min Max
Age(yr) 24.71 ± 4.13 22 38
Height(cm) 167.04 ± 7.87 148 183
Weight(kg) 58.75 ± 10.66 43 82

Gender Male 19(39.58 %)

Female 29(60.42 %)

Dominant Right 47(97.92 %)

Left 1(2.08 %)

Experience No 28(58.33 %)

1~2 17(35.42 %)

>2 3(6.25 %)


1. Lee TS. The sports science dictionary. Seoul: Minjungseogwan, [cited 2015 February 10]. Available from:

2. Bowsher D. Mechanisms of acupuncture, theory and basic science. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. 1988:69–82.

3. Ahn JG. Pharmacopuncture and clinical application. Seoul: Korean Pharmacopuncture Medicine Society. 1997:1–8.

4. Seong NG. A clinical evaluation of stimlation and alnalgesic mechanism based on chichimbub. Korean Institute of Oriental Medicine Letters. 1994;3(1):152–5.

5. Baek ST, Byun H, Park MJ, et al. Analysis the correlation of filtration rate of herbal-acupunctures and pain score of herbal acupuncture stimulation. The Journal of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society. 2006;23(6):98–9.

6. Kim YJ, Kim EJ, Kyung MS. A study of quantitative analysis of six basic reinforcing-reducing acupunctural manipulations in Huang di nei jing. The Journal of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society. 2012;29(5):151–8.

7. Han JS. Acupuncture: neuropeptide release produced by electrical stimulation of different frequencies. Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience. 2003;26(1):17–22.
8. Seo JC, Yoon JS, Park HJ, et al. The clinical study on acupuncture sensation in CC, CF and BV herbal acupuncture. Journal of Pharmacopuncture. 2004;7(1):68–9.

9. Yoon JS, Seo JC, Lee HS, et al. The clinical study on acupuncture sensation in Hwangryunhaedoktang herbal acupuncture and Hominis Placenta herbal acupuncture. The Journal of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society. 2004;21(4):203–4.

10. Lee ES, Oh JY, Kim YJ, et al. The clinical study about qualitative and quantitative characteristics of acupuncture sensation according to the type of pharmacopuncture: study about BUM pharmacopuncture, Mountain Ginseng pharmacopuncture and sciatica No. 5 pharmacopuncture. The Journal of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society. 2013;30(5):31–2.
11. World Health Organization. WHO standard acupuncture point locations in the Western Pacific Region. Geneva: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific. 2008:38.

12. Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society, Textbook Compilation Committee. The acupuncture and moxibustion. Seoul: Jipmoondang. 2008:265.

13. Ju CJ, Xie W. On reinforcing and reducing methods in moxibustion. Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2003;1(1):47–50.

14. Kim YH, Yeo SJ, Choe IH, Kim YK, Lim S. The study on temperature measurement for the standardization of moxibustion. The Journal of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society. 2008;25(2):129–38.

15. Han SY, OH SE. Effect of different solvents on the degree of tissue damage and pain by streptomycin intramuscular injection. Chonnam Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2000;5(1):156–9.

16. Zelman S. Notes on techniques of intramuscular injection. American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 1961;563–74.
crossref pmid
17. Gwak BG, Kim SH, Yu YG. Optimal scan time of dual-phase spiral CT in normal rabbit liver: effect of contrast injection rate. Korean Journal of Radiology. 1999;40(6):1161–2.

18. Noh SS. Dermatology. Seoul: ICB. 2006:12–40.

19. Choi DW, Sohng KY, Kim BS. Prediction of optimal gluteal intramuscular deedle length by skinfold thickness measurements in Korean adults. J Korean academy Nurs. 2010;40(6):849–50.

20. Kim GY, Kim DY, Lee SW. Postinjection soreness in myofacial pain syndrome: its course, associated factors and the effect of acetaminophen. Journal of The Korean Association of Pain Medicine. 2006;5(2):114.

21. Tuttle Brain. Intramuscular injections and bioavailability. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacology. 1977;34(9):965–8.
22. Jeong JH, Ahn HY. Peripheral intravenous injection pain in hospitalized children. The Research Institute of Nursing Science Seoul National University. 2014:11(2):150–1.

23. Kim MW. Study of pain according to intramuscular injection’s velocity and region. Seoul: Yeonsei University. Korean. 1988:

24. Park IS. Quantitative sensory test: a study of acupuncture point sensitivity by sites. Dongguk University. 2013:Korean.

Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+
METRICS Graph View
  • 2 Crossref
  • 3,175 View
  • 29 Download
Related articles in JAR

Article and Issues
For this Journal
For Authors
Submit Manuscript
Editorial Office
Gil Korean Medical Hospital, Gachon University
Keunumul-Ro, Chung-Ku, Inchoen 22138, Korea
Tel: +82-70-7606-6353,4    Fax: +82-32-232-3334    E-mail:                

Copyright © 2021 by Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next