Journal of Acupuncture Research 2020; 37(1): 28-34
Published online February 20, 2020
https://doi.org/10.13045/jar.2019.00339
© Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine Society
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This is a systematic review of the clinical use of cupping therapy. Four domestic databases and 2 foreign databases were searched. Studies that reported the cupping pressure used during cupping therapy were included in this study. The types of cupping, cupping site, pressure, and duration of cupping were the main parameters analyzed. A total of 27 studies, including 24 experimental studies were analyzed. There were 12 constant negative pressure (domestic) studies with a range between 60 mmHg and 600 mmHg. There were 5 maximum negative pressure (domestic) studies and the maximum negative pressure was 620 mmHg. Three studies used a maximum negative pressure of 600 mmHg. There were 4 constant negative pressure (foreign) studies with a range between 75 mmHg to 750 mmHg. There were 3 maximum negative pressure (foreign) studies with a maximum pressure of 420 mmHg. The studies differed with regards to the materials used and the amount of pressure applied. Many studies had limited information and therefore generalizability of the results in this review is limited. Further experimental studies are required to establish the correlation between cupping pressure and treatment effects so that cupping therapy can be standardised.
Keywords cupping therapy, pressure, review
Journal of Acupuncture Research 2020; 37(1): 28-34
Published online February 20, 2020 https://doi.org/10.13045/jar.2019.00339
Copyright © Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine Society.
Ku Weon Kim1, Tae Wook Lee1, Ha Lim Lee1, Soo Kwang An1, Hyo Sung Park1, Ji Won Choi2, Byung Ryul Lee2,3, Gi Young Yang2,3*
1School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea;2Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, Pusan National University Korean Medicine Hospital, Yangsan, Korea;3Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This is a systematic review of the clinical use of cupping therapy. Four domestic databases and 2 foreign databases were searched. Studies that reported the cupping pressure used during cupping therapy were included in this study. The types of cupping, cupping site, pressure, and duration of cupping were the main parameters analyzed. A total of 27 studies, including 24 experimental studies were analyzed. There were 12 constant negative pressure (domestic) studies with a range between 60 mmHg and 600 mmHg. There were 5 maximum negative pressure (domestic) studies and the maximum negative pressure was 620 mmHg. Three studies used a maximum negative pressure of 600 mmHg. There were 4 constant negative pressure (foreign) studies with a range between 75 mmHg to 750 mmHg. There were 3 maximum negative pressure (foreign) studies with a maximum pressure of 420 mmHg. The studies differed with regards to the materials used and the amount of pressure applied. Many studies had limited information and therefore generalizability of the results in this review is limited. Further experimental studies are required to establish the correlation between cupping pressure and treatment effects so that cupping therapy can be standardised.
Keywords: cupping therapy, pressure, review
Soo Kwang An, Ku Weon Kim, Ha Lim Lee, Tae Wook Lee, Eun Seok Kim, Byung Ryul Lee, Gi Young Yang*
Journal of Acupuncture Research 2021; 38(3): 200-204Yeonhak Kim, Yoona Oh, Jihun Kim, Eunseok Kim, Gi Young Yang, Byung Ryul Lee*
Journal of Acupuncture Research 2022; 39(4): 317-322Jin-Ho Jeong, Jaseung Ku, Ji Hye Hwang*
Journal of Acupuncture Research 2022; 39(4): 267-274